Press "Enter" to skip to content

Posts tagged as University of California

Plants have senses, language & culture

LONDON: Are plants rather cleverer than once thought? Scientists from around the world are claiming that plants cannot just sense, In an experiment in Australia, plants appeared to learn to associate a sound with a food source, just as Pavlov’s dogs linked the sound of a bell with dinner.

In Israel they’ve found that plants communicated a message from one to another, and that the information was then used to survive drought. In British Columbia and the UK researchers have shown that trees pass information and nutrients to each other through an underground fungal network.This even happens more with closely related trees or seedlings than with strangers. And in California it turns out that sagebrush shrubs have “regional dialects”! Botanist James Wong explores these findings and asks whether, if plants can do all these things, and if, as one scientist says, they are a “who” and not a “what”, then is it wrong to eat them?Six reasons plants are cleverer than you thinkIn Is Eating Plants Wrong? botanist James Wong discovers that plants are capable of things that used to be thought the preserve of animals, or even humans.
He speaks with plant scientists from around the world whose research has led them to conclude that plants can communicate, learn, and even remember. Some even go as far as to say plants are intelligent.Plants communicate through fragrances: Plants can communicate by emitting scents called volatile organic compounds through the air. These scents are picked up by other parts of the same plant, or by neighbouring plants, who then react to them, change their defences, and as a result receive less chewing damage from the different insects that nibble their leaves.
So if a leaf is being eaten by an insect or a caterpillar, the plant releases a warning scent, which nearby leaves pick up, and act on by emitting a different compound to repel the insect, or to attract predators of the nibbler like birds or wasps to come and eat it.Sagebrush shrubs have regional dialects: Professor Rick Karban of the University of California at Davis found that sagebrush shrubs are more effective at communicating with neighbouring plants, than with those growing over two hundred kilometres away.
The sagebrush plants use different regional dialects for communication!In a scientifically rigorous experiment, they found that the southern sagebrush shrubs did not respond to cues from their northern cousins as much as to those from southern plants, and vice versa. The shrubs don’t seem to understand their distant cousins as well as their neighbours.Professor Karban and his team were able to measure and confirm this by using both northern and southern sagebrush clippings in both northern and southern locations, to make sure it’s actually the dialect that’s different, and not the topic of conversation, as it were.Plants can learn to associate a sound with food (a light source) like Pavlov’s dogs: The Russian scientist Ivan Pavlov famously found that his dogs learned to associate the sound of a bell with the arrival of food.
He would ring a bell before serving them their meal, and the animals came to salivate at the mere sound of the bell, before dinner was dished up.Dr Monica Gagliano of the University of Western Australia tried a similar test with pea seedlings and found that the plants did indeed learn to associate sound with food! The plants learned to make an association, remembered it, and acted upon it.Which led Dr Gagliano to ask, who is making the choice?. Who, not what!Plants can play Chinese whispers and remember the message: Plants can communicate through substances they emit through their roots, as well as through fragrances sent out from their leaves.
And if potted in a row, sharing roots in each pot, they can play Chinese whispers. They can pass a message from the first root of the first plant down to the last plant in the same row of pots.And they can remember the passed-down message, and act on it when necessary!What’s more, they can distinguish between related and unrelated trees, and, for example, send more carbon to their kin than to strangers! It seems to be that trees really do have a preference for sharing with kin, and that it’s the tree making that choice, not the fungus. Dr Brian Pickles of the University of Reading, who collaborates with Prof.
Simard, tested this on tree seedlings.Plants can sense more than we can: Plants don’t have brains, and yet without brains, and without neurons even, they can do many things that we need brains and sensory organs for.So without eyes plants can perceive a lot of information about light, without noses they can perceive chemical information like smells, without ears they can perceive the vibrations of sounds. Plants are very perceptive about what’s going on in their environments.
They can sense touch, and taste, too, for example they can identify herbivore predators nibbling their leaves from the taste of the herbivore’s saliva. So plants have the same five senses humans have? And then some, says Prof.Rick Karban. Namely plants can also perceive electrical signals, temperature, electromagnetic forces, heavy metals, pathogens, gravity and more.
View on www.thenews.com.pk

Please follow and like us:

Artificial intelligence diagnoses flu, gastro more accurately than junior doctors

In the near future your first contact at a hospital might be with a computer that decides whether you have glandular fever or just the flu.
Now it appears doctors may also be in line, with scientists reporting they have built a system that automatically diagnoses common childhood conditions as accurately as a trained physician.
Nature Medicine, a group of researchers in the United States and China reported they had trained an AI on medical records from 1.3 million patient visits at a major medical centre in Guangzhou, China.
When tested on previously unseen cases, the AI could diagnose glandular fever, roseola, influenza, chicken pox, and hand-foot-mouth disease with between 90 and 97 per cent accuracy. When tested against 20 doctors, the AI system made more accurate diagnoses than junior medics.
It was more than 90 percent accurate at diagnosing asthma; the accuracy of physicians in the study ranged from 80 to 94 percent.In diagnosing gastrointestinal disease, the system was 87 percent accurate, compared with the physicians’ accuracy of 82 to 90 percent.
Could a robot do your job? Search our database to find out how your job is affected.Dr Kang Zhang, chief of ophthalmic genetics at the University of California and the lead author of the report, said the AI could help sort hospital patients according to their severity, as well as improve the diagnosis of complex, rare conditions.
“Our study provides a proof of concept for implementing an AI-based system as a means to aid physicians in tackling large amounts of data, augmenting diagnostic evaluations, and to provide clinical decision support in cases of diagnostic uncertainty or complexity,” Dr Zhang said. “When you’re busy you can see 80 patients a day.
And you can only grasp so much information. That’s where we potentially as human physicians might make mistakes.
AI doesn’t have to sleep, it has a large memory and doesn’t lose energy.This doesn’t mean computers will replace doctorsThis week, the same day as the Nature MedicineMany organisations are developing and testing systems that analyse electronic health records to detect medical conditions such as diabetes and heart failure.
In July last year, an AI system beat a team of 15 doctors in a competition that looked at the ability to diagnose brain tumours. The NHS report proposes that smart speakers – like Alexa and Siri – could soon be used with a “mental health triage bot” that engages in conversation while analysing text and voice for suicidal ideas and emotion.
Technology such as this could help save millions of hours of GP’s time, it says.”Our review of the evidence leads us to suggest that these technologies will not replace healthcare professionals, but will enhance them .
giving them more time to care for patients,” the authors of the report conclude

Please follow and like us: